PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.26%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
144.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
82.96%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
64.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 9.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
64.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SDI.L's 103.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-31.08%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is at 104.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.08%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is 77.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-27.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 1077.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.34% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.