PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.32%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
144.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 9.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
69.07%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SDI.L's 88.08%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-20.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is at 74.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
19.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SDI.L's 35.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-73.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is at 4640.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is 1472.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-64.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 77.89%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.94% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-48.73%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SDI.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.