PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 52.64%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
104.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SDI.L's 140.63%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
42.08%
3Y CAGR of 42.08% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
245.34%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SDI.L's 851.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
175.49%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 1075.48%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
46.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 46.04% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-199.24%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is at 456.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-203.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SDI.L is 5225.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-180.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SDI.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 100.10% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SDI.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.