PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 206.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
202.49%
5Y CAGR of 202.49% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
170.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 113.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
176.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 3.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
67.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.88% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-20.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
268.34%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 651.79%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
434.45%
Net income/share CAGR of 434.45% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
471.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 8.46% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
10.25%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 82.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.