PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
945.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 366.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
328.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SDI.L's 590.71%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
97.14%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 50.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
513.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SDI.L's 807.94%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
675.84%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 420.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
69.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
713.07%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 5889.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2558.26%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 321.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
3101.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.76%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 137.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
24.87%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 59.45%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
250.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 250.23% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
583.14%
Dividend/share CAGR of 583.14% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
168.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 168.38% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.