PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
801.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 113.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
140.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to SDI.L's 151.10%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
147.07%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 18.86%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-252.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L stands at 192.95%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-265.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is at 72.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-180.33%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
611.51%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 1656.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
4892.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
5793.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.69%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 133.46%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SDI.L's 43.17%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SDI.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.