PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.62%
Positive revenue growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.26%
Positive gross profit growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.39%
Positive EBIT growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.32%
Positive operating income growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.46%
Positive net income growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.36%
Share count expansion well above SDI.L's 0.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.73%
Diluted share count expanding well above SDI.L's 1.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
52.39%
Dividend growth of 52.39% while SDI.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
632.26%
Positive OCF growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
400.79%
Positive FCF growth while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
425.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 113.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
74.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SDI.L's 151.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
67.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 18.86%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1221.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 192.95%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
291.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 72.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
348.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
334.49%
Below 50% of SDI.L's 1656.20%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
533.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
260.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while SDI.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SDI.L's 133.46%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
92.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SDI.L's 43.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1107.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1107.99% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
107.80%
Dividend/share CAGR of 107.80% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.22% while SDI.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.41%
Inventory is declining while SDI.L stands at 9.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.56%
Asset growth above 1.5x SDI.L's 5.72%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
37.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SDI.L's 2.64%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
226.54%
Debt growth far above SDI.L's 16.99%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
We expand SG&A while SDI.L cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.