PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.91%
Revenue growth under 50% of SOM.L's 13.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.10%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of SOM.L's 15.12%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-18.91%
Negative EBIT growth while SOM.L is at 21.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.91%
Negative operating income growth while SOM.L is at 21.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.66%
Negative net income growth while SOM.L stands at 23.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.12%
Negative EPS growth while SOM.L is at 23.35%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SOM.L is at 22.95%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.96%
Share reduction while SOM.L is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.96%
Reduced diluted shares while SOM.L is at 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
49.21%
Dividend growth above 1.5x SOM.L's 27.04%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
8.59%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SOM.L's 16.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
2.37%
FCF growth under 50% of SOM.L's 20.83%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
40.27%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SOM.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
40.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 264.40%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
40.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SOM.L's 76.81%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
41.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SOM.L's 65.28%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
41.74%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 2399.45%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
41.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 112.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-25.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 44.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is 713.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-25.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SOM.L is 166.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
80.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 80.64% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
80.64%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 340.93%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.69%
SG&A growth well above SOM.L's 11.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.