PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 10.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
144.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 109.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
82.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 33.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
64.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 3791.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
64.47%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 198.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 63.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-31.08%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 692.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.08%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is 301.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-27.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SOM.L is 86.08%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
63.86%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 1185.45%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
35.34%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 270.36%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.