PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SOM.L's 199.36%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
144.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 50.51%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
77.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 12.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
69.07%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 1441.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-20.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 52.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
19.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 10.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-73.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 211.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is 45.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-64.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SOM.L is 47.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.94% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-48.73%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 1007.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SOM.L invests at 313.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.