PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
281.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 199.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
275.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 50.51%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
172.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 12.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
95.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 1441.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-8.28%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 52.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
38.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 10.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-112.80%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 211.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-114.85%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SOM.L is 45.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-117.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SOM.L is 47.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SOM.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 1007.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SOM.L invests at 313.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.