PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
511.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SOM.L is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
358.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SOM.L is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SOM.L is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
237.47%
Positive OCF/share growth while SOM.L is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.29%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
23.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SOM.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
603.78%
Dividend/share CAGR of 603.78% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
481.32%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while SOM.L is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.