PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
407.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SOM.L's 702.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
164.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SOM.L's 200.56%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
33.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 188.70%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-175.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 1299.02%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-132.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L is at 143.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-138.62%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 156.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
109.51%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 6367.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
69.66%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 256.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1736.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 211.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 67.78%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
0.73%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 40.68%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SOM.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 534.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.