PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
683.20%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 511.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.08%
3Y CAGR of 28.08% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1237.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 753.97%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 216.23% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
172.43%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 972.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 130.30% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SOM.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
875.70%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 3335.91%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 38.64% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.