PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 451.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
202.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 163.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
170.93%
3Y CAGR of 170.93% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
176.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SOM.L's 365.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
67.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SOM.L's 56.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-20.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
268.34%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 874.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
434.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 142.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
471.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 471.15% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Below 50% of SOM.L's 55.41%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.25%
Equity/share CAGR of 10.25% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SOM.L stands at 6176.30%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 388.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.