PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
801.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 256.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
140.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to SOM.L's 136.70%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
147.07%
3Y CAGR of 147.07% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
-252.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-265.73%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-180.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SOM.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
611.51%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 128.07% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
4892.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SOM.L's 57.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
5793.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 5793.15% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 30.69% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
43.45%
Equity/share CAGR of 43.45% while SOM.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SOM.L stands at 2845.33%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.