215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.69%
Revenue growth of 1.69% while VTU.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-0.94%
Negative gross profit growth while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.01%
Negative EBIT growth while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.01%
Negative operating income growth while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-13.78%
Negative net income growth while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.61%
Negative EPS growth while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.61%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend growth of 243.18% while VTU.L is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
113.67%
OCF growth of 113.67% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
114.15%
FCF growth of 114.15% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
1.69%
10Y CAGR of 1.69% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
1.69%
5Y CAGR of 1.69% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
1.69%
3Y CAGR of 1.69% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
113.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 113.67% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
113.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 113.67% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
113.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 113.67% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-13.78%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-13.78%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13.78%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
243.18%
Dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
243.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 243.18% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.32%
SG&A growth of 11.32% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.