PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 130.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
33.50%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 82.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
33.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTU.L's 49.28%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
25.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 1236.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
25.36%
Below 50% of VTU.L's 1537.34%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 1038.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-4.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is 124.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Below 50% of VTU.L's 159.02%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
21.07%
Below 50% of VTU.L's 50.67%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
21.07%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTU.L's 39.53%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.