PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.95%
10Y CAGR of 91.95% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
91.95%
5Y CAGR of 91.95% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
88.76%
3Y CAGR of 88.76% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
136.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 136.47% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
136.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 136.47% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
10.67%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 10.67% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
23.49%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 23.49% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
23.49%
Net income/share CAGR of 23.49% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
43.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 43.22% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
14.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.15% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-66.74%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTU.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.