PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.26%
10Y CAGR of 144.26% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
144.26%
5Y CAGR of 144.26% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
82.96%
3Y CAGR of 82.96% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
64.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.47% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
64.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 64.47% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
31.20%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 31.20% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-31.08%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.08%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-27.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
63.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.86% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.34%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.34% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.