PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.32%
10Y CAGR of 148.32% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
144.19%
5Y CAGR of 144.19% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
77.02%
3Y CAGR of 77.02% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
69.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 69.07% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-20.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
19.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 19.28% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-73.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-69.41%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-64.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 75.94% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-48.73%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTU.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.