PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.71%
10Y CAGR of 172.71% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
104.28%
5Y CAGR of 104.28% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
42.08%
3Y CAGR of 42.08% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
245.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 245.34% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
175.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 175.49% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
46.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 46.04% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-199.24%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-203.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-180.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTU.L is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Equity/share CAGR of 100.10% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTU.L invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.