PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
683.20%
10Y CAGR of 683.20% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.08%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTU.L's 52.02%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
1237.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 1237.81% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.23%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 954.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
172.43%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 172.43% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to VTU.L's 142.83%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTU.L is at 38.62%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
875.70%
Dividend/share CAGR of 875.70% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 16.05%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.