PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
638.86%
10Y CAGR of 638.86% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
202.49%
5Y CAGR of 202.49% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
170.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTU.L's 133.24%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
176.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 176.11% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
67.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 67.88% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-20.05%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
268.34%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 268.34% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
434.45%
Net income/share CAGR of 434.45% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
471.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VTU.L's 848.28%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 8.46% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
10.25%
Below 50% of VTU.L's 44.16%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.