PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
945.38%
10Y CAGR of 945.38% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
328.10%
5Y CAGR of 328.10% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
97.14%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTU.L's 74.87%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
513.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 513.91% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
675.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 675.84% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
69.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 1586.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
713.07%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 713.07% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2558.26%
Net income/share CAGR of 2558.26% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
3101.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTU.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.76% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
24.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTU.L's 39.24%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
250.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 250.23% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
583.14%
Dividend/share CAGR of 583.14% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
168.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 168.38% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.