PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
801.86%
10Y CAGR of 801.86% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
140.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 68.92%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
147.07%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 40.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-252.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-265.73%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-180.33%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
611.51%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 611.51% while VTU.L is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
4892.57%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 37.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
5793.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTU.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VTU.L's 47.26%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
43.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 24.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTU.L stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.