PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.62%
Positive revenue growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.26%
Positive gross profit growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.39%
Positive EBIT growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.32%
Positive operating income growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.46%
Positive net income growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
4.36%
Slight or no buybacks while VTU.L is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.73%
Slight or no buyback while VTU.L is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
52.39%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while VTU.L cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
632.26%
OCF growth under 50% of VTU.L's 21158.01%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
400.79%
FCF growth 50-75% of VTU.L's 541.86%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
425.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 130.83%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
74.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to VTU.L's 82.54%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
67.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTU.L's 49.28%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
1221.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with VTU.L's 1236.46%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
291.54%
Below 50% of VTU.L's 1537.34%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
348.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTU.L's 1038.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
334.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VTU.L is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
533.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 124.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
260.55%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTU.L is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTU.L's 54.63%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
92.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 19.72%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1107.99%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 159.02%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
107.80%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 50.67%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VTU.L's 39.53%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-19.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTU.L shows 13.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.41%
Inventory is declining while VTU.L stands at 3.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
20.56%
Asset growth above 1.5x VTU.L's 7.13%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
37.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VTU.L's 2.10%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
226.54%
Debt growth far above VTU.L's 8.96%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.00%
SG&A growth well above VTU.L's 1.07%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.