PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
215.00 - 235.00
210.00 - 590.00
2.95M / 482.4K (Avg.)
11.40 | 0.20
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
407.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 21.48%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
164.56%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
33.01%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 10.32%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-175.69%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-132.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-138.62%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
109.51%
Net income/share CAGR of 109.51% while Consumer Defensive median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
69.66%
Net income/share CAGR of 69.66% while Consumer Defensive median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
1736.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1736.70% while Consumer Defensive median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Defensive median of 6.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
0.73%
Below 50% of Consumer Defensive median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Defensive median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.