95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
9.10%
Cash & equivalents growing 9.10% while AEM's declined -37.48%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
Below half of AEM's -37.48%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
32.57%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.58%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 5.29%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
30100.00%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -37.39%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
7.20%
Below half of AEM's -29.64%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
15.20%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.61%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.78%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.78%
Similar yoy changes to AEM's -9.82%. Walter Schloss sees parallel intangible strategies or acquisitions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506700.00%
Above 1.5x AEM's 12.92%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.54%
Below half of AEM's 5.38%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.06%
Below half of AEM's -0.34%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
48.19%
Less than half of AEM's -19.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.23%
Exceeding 1.5x AEM's -55.43%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
35.16%
Less than half of AEM's -25.22%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.78%
Less than half of AEM's -0.18%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-48.78%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
35.16%
Less than half of AEM's -2.21%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
Below half AEM's -0.33%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.07%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 1.57%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
4.06%
Below half AEM's -0.34%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.10%
Less than half of AEM's 7.30%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.