95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
55.10%
Cash & equivalents growing 55.10% while AEM's declined -14.27%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.10%
Below half of AEM's -14.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.15%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.29%
Inventory growth 50-75% of AEM's 13.40%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Below half of AEM's -8.87%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.14%
Below half AEM's 4.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.61%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.61%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.26%
Less than half of AEM's 34.34%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.47%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 4.82%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.98%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.39%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
0.46%
Less than half of AEM's -5.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Less than half of AEM's 5.87%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.46%
Similar yoy to AEM's 0.52%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in long-term liabilities.
-0.46%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.46%
Less than half of AEM's 0.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.19%
Below half AEM's -1.87%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-8.61%
Less than half of AEM's 151.40%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.09%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.12%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
13.98%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.39%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.10%
Less than half of AEM's 802.55%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.