95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-35.12%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-35.12% vs AEM's -5.12%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.12%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's -5.12%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
32.53%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.35%
Inventory growth above 1.5x AEM's 7.00%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Below half of AEM's -6.11%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
161.37%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.65%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Less than half of AEM's 21.24%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-53.66%
Below half of AEM's 5.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.66%
Below half of AEM's 2.40%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-89.08%
Less than half of AEM's 23.92%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.71%
Above 1.5x AEM's 10.05%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.81%
Less than half of AEM's 7.38%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
118.90%
Above 1.5x AEM's 7.61%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.96%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -5.76%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-11.66%
Less than half of AEM's 492.77%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.19%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -0.13%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-13.66%
Below half AEM's 2.40%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.90%
Above 1.5x AEM's 27.37%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.