95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-92.89%
Cash & equivalents declining -92.89% while AEM's grows 23.16%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.89%
Below half of AEM's 4.26%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
21.16%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 120.02%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-28.98%
Similar inventory growth to AEM's -27.97%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
445.45%
Above 1.5x AEM's 15.23%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-90.14%
Below half of AEM's 8.87%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.59%
Above 1.5x AEM's -51.33%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
289.21%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 9.35%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.23%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 9.23%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-52.47%
Above 1.5x AEM's -34.95%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4301.73%
Less than half of AEM's -35.02%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5294.83%
Less than half of AEM's -45.17%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9146.35%
Less than half of AEM's -43.79%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.74%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 22.61%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-1.86%
Less than half of AEM's -41.68%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
50.21%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 35.21%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
117.23%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 9.23%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.77%
Less than half of AEM's -203.08%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.