95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
19.97%
Cash & equivalents growing 19.97% while AEM's declined -29.87%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.97%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's 7.37%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-10.03%
Receivables growth above 1.5x AEM's -3.29%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.73%
Above 1.5x AEM's -24.58%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
19.24%
Below half of AEM's -0.28%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.40%
Less than half of AEM's 828.44%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.40%
Below half of AEM's 6.50%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.87%
Similar yoy to AEM's 3.75%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
41.71%
Above 1.5x AEM's 6.88%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
Less than half of AEM's -12.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.77%
50-75% of AEM's 1.24%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
-0.77%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.52%
Less than half of AEM's -2.34%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.34%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 64.34%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
0.57%
Less than half of AEM's 3.91%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.95%
0.75-0.9x AEM's 4.78%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
3.87%
Similar yoy to AEM's 3.75%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.60%
Less than half of AEM's 28.44%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
