95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
43.05%
Cash & equivalents growing 43.05% while AEM's declined -12.27%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.05%
Below half of AEM's -7.96%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
25.70%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 67.02%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -88.55%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
36.09%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.46%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.42%
Less than half of AEM's 6.08%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.42%
Below half of AEM's 10.43%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Below half of AEM's 8.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-14.06%
Less than half of AEM's -36.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-0.01%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.54%
Less than half of AEM's 44.25%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.73%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.73%
Above 1.5x AEM's -0.43%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.25%
Less than half of AEM's 6.11%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.53%
Below half AEM's 54.36%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5.36%
Less than half of AEM's -100.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
4436700.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.95%
Below half AEM's 8.71%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.67%
Below half AEM's 8.06%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.49%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.24%
Less than half of AEM's 14.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.