95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-34.72%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-34.72% vs AEM's -19.88%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.72%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's -17.57%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
43.63%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.06%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 2459.55%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-17.49%
1.25-1.5x AEM's -14.02%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Less than half of AEM's -1.88%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.06%
Below half of AEM's 7.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Below half of AEM's 3.07%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
46.52%
Less than half of AEM's 114.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.51%
1.1-1.25x AEM's -2.90%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
-8.57%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.57%
Less than half of AEM's 3.91%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
Less than half of AEM's 2.56%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 25.76%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-1.05%
Less than half of AEM's -2133.09%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.09%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 3.24%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
-0.23%
Below half AEM's 3.07%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.99%
Less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-7.34%
Less than half of AEM's 17.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.