95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-48.38%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-48.38% vs AEM's -39.06%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.38%
Below half of AEM's 23.67%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
284.08%
Receivables growth above 1.5x AEM's 67.02%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.93%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -76.57%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-39.70%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -11.54%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.85%
Above 1.5x AEM's -6.27%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
5.86%
0.75-0.9x AEM's 7.18%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Similar yoy to AEM's 4.87%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
47.41%
Less than half of AEM's -64.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
6.45%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.12%
Less than half of AEM's -10.06%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.86%
Less than half of AEM's -33.33%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Less than half of AEM's 31.02%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
5.86%
Less than half of AEM's -20.54%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.53%
Less than half of AEM's -18.64%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.14%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -3.66%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of AEM's 1755.88%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.23%
Below half AEM's 16.37%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.32%
Similar yoy to AEM's 4.87%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.91%
Less than half of AEM's -30.04%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
8.09%
Less than half of AEM's -24.65%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.