PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.35%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-25.35% vs AEM's -23.17%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's -5.97%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-11.21%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 30.60%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.97%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -19.18%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-24.93%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -1.10%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-0.46%
Below half AEM's 3.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.19%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Less than half of AEM's 40.50%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.75%
Below half of AEM's 4.02%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Below half of AEM's 3.26%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
213.41%
Less than half of AEM's -8.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-83.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both AEM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Exceeding 1.5x AEM's -54.00%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-44.56%
Less than half of AEM's 6.31%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-6.25%
Less than half of AEM's 4.38%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Less than half of AEM's 8.83%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.93%
Less than half of AEM's 4.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.34%
Less than half of AEM's 4.84%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.34%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 10.20%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
68.80%
Less than half of AEM's 166.35%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 2.42%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-2.72%
Below half AEM's 3.26%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
48.19%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 36.52%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if robust new investments are prudent.
-52.05%
Less than half of AEM's 4.38%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-321.65%
Less than half of AEM's 16.44%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.