95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
67.97%
Cash & equivalents growing 67.97% while AEM's declined -32.32%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.97%
Below half of AEM's -3.80%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-9.10%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 34.76%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.32%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 2.50%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
65.38%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 9.87%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-1.56%
Below half AEM's -4.84%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.37%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.48%
Less than half of AEM's -14.06%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.71%
Below half of AEM's -1.47%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
Below half of AEM's -0.21%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
9430.97%
Less than half of AEM's -18.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
0.5-0.75x AEM's -143.53%. Martin Whitman sees weaker advanced billings vs. competitor.
-105.77%
1.1-1.25x AEM's -92.63%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
-4.75%
Less than half of AEM's 30.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-8.33%
Similar yoy to AEM's -9.09%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approaches to long-term financing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Less than half of AEM's 27.79%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.08%
Less than half of AEM's -7.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.33%
Similar yoy to AEM's -3.29%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.07%
Below half AEM's -4.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
89.71%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 62.59%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger swings in AOCI.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.37%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 1.41%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
11.48%
Below half AEM's -0.21%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
83.37%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 55.43%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-6.25%
50-75% of AEM's -10.28%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively smaller yoy debt additions.
-128.19%
Above 1.5x AEM's -4.95%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.