95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
17.30%
Cash & equivalents growing 17.30% while AEM's declined -28.55%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.30%
Below half of AEM's -26.22%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-61.08%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 14.45%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.94%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 34.19%. Martin Whitman worries about added complexity or intangible expansions.
15.32%
Below half of AEM's -16.61%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.05%
Below half AEM's 4.41%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.35%
Both AEM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.23%
Less than half of AEM's 6.95%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.10%
Below half of AEM's 3.96%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Below half of AEM's 0.14%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-36.91%
Less than half of AEM's 91.87%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159204.00%
Less than half of AEM's -35.78%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
291.74%
Above 1.5x AEM's 0.53%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-13.90%
Less than half of AEM's 0.04%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.16%
Less than half of AEM's -1.42%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
13.22%
Less than half of AEM's 220.17%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-13.85%
Less than half of AEM's 0.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.12%
Less than half of AEM's 0.61%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.04%
50-75% of AEM's 0.08%. Bruce Berkowitz notes minimal new equity relative to competitor.
2.09%
Below half AEM's 9.32%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-4.95%
Less than half of AEM's -233.91%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.04%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.53%
Below half AEM's -0.14%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.80%
Below half AEM's 0.14%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-3.35%
Below half AEM's -15.19%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-13.90%
Above 1.5x AEM's -0.01%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-18.47%
Less than half of AEM's 24.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
