95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-30.69%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-30.69% vs AEM's -37.52%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.69%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x AEM's -25.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-27.48%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's -92.94%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 3.04%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
79.50%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 900.16%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-29.38%
Below half of AEM's 3.33%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.70%
Below half AEM's 1.68%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.48%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
15.65%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 28.98%. Martin Whitman warns that the firm may be missing strategic opportunities.
-11.48%
Less than half of AEM's -299.76%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-5.61%
Less than half of AEM's 71.57%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-3.15%
Below half of AEM's 2.10%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.67%
Below half of AEM's 2.25%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
23.59%
Similar yoy growth to AEM's 31.25%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
85.45%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.45%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -1.52%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
8.07%
Exceeding 1.5x AEM's 3.99%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-59.84%
Less than half of AEM's 136.26%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-7.44%
Less than half of AEM's -20.87%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-96882.96%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -0.45%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
5.04%
Less than half of AEM's -0.45%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
52.70%
Above 1.5x AEM's 5.14%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-7.27%
50-75% of AEM's -11.28%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.89%
Less than half of AEM's 2.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.65%
Less than half of AEM's 1.69%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-9.90%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -0.14%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
120.21%
Above 1.5x AEM's 0.38%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.18%
Below half AEM's 1.72%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.67%
Below half AEM's 2.25%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
15.65%
Below half AEM's -19.44%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-7.41%
Less than half of AEM's 0.02%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-4.66%
Less than half of AEM's 4.43%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.