95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
23.17%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of AEM's 119.56%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.17%
Below half of AEM's 112.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
139.98%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 466.56%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.95%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 6.36%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.56%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -54.48%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
26.29%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 21.41%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
-0.09%
Below half AEM's 0.64%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-3.27%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.06%
Below half of AEM's -8.65%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
22.67%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.35%
Less than half of AEM's -12.89%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.00%
Below half of AEM's 1.67%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.89%
Below half of AEM's 3.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
22.97%
50-75% of AEM's 31.14%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
84.56%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.56%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -11.68%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
49.07%
1.1-1.25x AEM's 40.79%. Bill Ackman wonders if the firm is incurring more one-time charges than competitor.
-72.36%
Less than half of AEM's 54.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.05%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.50%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
7.23%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 5.50%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier DTL expansions.
66.95%
Less than half of AEM's -54.63%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
42.27%
Less than half of AEM's -1.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.61%
Less than half of AEM's 4.94%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.50%
50-75% of AEM's 0.73%. Bruce Berkowitz notes minimal new equity relative to competitor.
4.91%
Below half AEM's 33.63%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.41%
Less than half of AEM's 78.47%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.06%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 3.08%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
0.89%
Below half AEM's 3.83%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
0.06%
Below half AEM's -9.25%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-4.69%
Less than half of AEM's 0.28%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-23.68%
Above 1.5x AEM's -9.41%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.