95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
66.41%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of AEM's 471.62%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.41%
Below half of AEM's 456.93%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
118.73%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's -20.89%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-15.06%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 28.98%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
181.26%
Above 1.5x AEM's 90.42%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
65.77%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 97.30%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-0.01%
Below half AEM's 131.36%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.58%
Less than half of AEM's 457.62%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
52.39%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 20.02%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
18.10%
Less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-98.43%
Less than half of AEM's 8.77%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.16%
Below half of AEM's 133.68%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
Below half of AEM's 129.03%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-14.91%
Less than half of AEM's 235.22%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51291.67%
Less than half of AEM's -48.99%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
277.02%
Above 1.5x AEM's 29.34%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.00%
Less than half of AEM's 207.84%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-52.65%
Less than half of AEM's 129.82%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-47.19%
Less than half of AEM's 76.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.92%
Above 1.5x AEM's 68.06%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
0.33%
Less than half of AEM's 175.74%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
3.59%
Below half AEM's -31.66%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-5.81%
Less than half of AEM's 49.82%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Below half AEM's 171.90%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.76%
Below half AEM's 129.03%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
52.39%
Similar yoy to AEM's 51.12%. Walter Schloss notes parallel moves in the investment portfolio.
-6.09%
Less than half of AEM's 0.87%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-67.34%
1.1-1.25x AEM's -57.01%. Bill Ackman questions if net debt is increasing faster than competitor.