95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
17.88%
Cash & equivalents growing 17.88% while AEM's declined -5.20%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.88%
Below half of AEM's -4.45%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-47.47%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's 15.59%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.63%
Above 1.5x AEM's -17.29%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
16.66%
Below half of AEM's -3.52%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.93%
Below half AEM's 0.36%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.74%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
188.74%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
44.66%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 15.20%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.10%
Less than half of AEM's 13.02%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.20%
Below half of AEM's 1.01%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 0.73%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-8.21%
Less than half of AEM's -66.39%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.95%
Less than half of AEM's 232.83%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
6.85%
Less than half of AEM's -8.98%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
40.58%
Less than half of AEM's -80.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
37.56%
Above 1.5x AEM's 0.09%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.84%
Less than half of AEM's -1.69%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.01%
Less than half of AEM's 0.07%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
0.51%
Below half AEM's 17.42%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-115.16%
Less than half of AEM's 31.89%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.01%
Below half AEM's 1.60%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.52%
Similar yoy to AEM's 0.57%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
35.25%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 7.44%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-8.70%
Less than half of AEM's -20.63%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-18.10%
Less than half of AEM's -44.26%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.