95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-62.40%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-62.40% vs FNV's -22.05%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.40%
Below half of FNV's 8.46%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-83.67%
Receivables growth less than half of FNV's 6.33%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.17%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-62.91%
Below half of FNV's 8.27%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.98%
1.25-1.5x FNV's -5.24%. Martin Whitman might worry about unproductive asset buildup.
-6.98%
≥ 1.5x FNV's -3.69%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
≥ 1.5x FNV's -1.29%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-31.58%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.06%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both FNV and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of FNV's 34.70%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-34.01%
Less than half of FNV's 34.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-28.93%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.93%
Less than half of FNV's 0.64%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.42%
Less than half of FNV's 5.51%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Below half FNV's 33.15%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-126.02%
Less than half of FNV's -460.79%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
Below half FNV's -1.53%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-8.63%
≥ 1.5x FNV's -1.29%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.61%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.82%
Less than half of FNV's 22.05%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.