95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-49.64%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-49.64% vs FNV's -1.02%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.64%
Below half of FNV's 14.54%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
51.09%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.16%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-49.06%
Below half of FNV's 24.63%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
26.71%
Higher PP&E (Net) Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.62%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
27.46%
Higher Total Non-Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Below half of FNV's 5.40%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-12.44%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.58%
Higher Total Current Liabilities Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-19.96%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4675.41%
Above 1.5x FNV's 25.72%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.96%
Less than half of FNV's -53.23%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.50%
Less than half of FNV's 4.90%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.95%
Higher Retained Earnings Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating better performance.
108.47%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
232.50%
Less than half of FNV's -100.00%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
4.60%
0.75-0.9x FNV's 5.42%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
-0.34%
Below half FNV's 5.40%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
40.62%
Below half FNV's 1054.02%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-11.10%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
52.03%
Above 1.5x FNV's 1.02%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.