PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.35%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-25.35% vs FSM's -8.65%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Below half of FSM's 9.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.21%
Receivables growth less than half of FSM's 616.71%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.97%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.93%
Below half of FSM's 6.63%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.46%
Below half FSM's 6.27%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.19%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Less than half of FSM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.75%
Below half of FSM's 6.23%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Below half of FSM's 6.37%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
213.41%
Less than half of FSM's 11104.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-83.08%
Similar yoy changes to FSM's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds a parallel approach to short-term funding.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both FSM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.56%
Less than half of FSM's 16.48%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-6.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Above 1.5x FSM's 0.48%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-0.93%
Less than half of FSM's 5.88%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.34%
Less than half of FSM's 10.40%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.34%
≥ 1.5x FSM's 9.98%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
68.80%
Less than half of FSM's 459.46%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
0.75-0.9x FSM's 5.44%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
-2.72%
Below half FSM's 6.37%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
48.19%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating better performance.
-52.05%
Similar yoy changes to FSM's -50.12%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-321.65%
Less than half of FSM's 1.43%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.