PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-18.31%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-18.31% vs FSM's -4.73%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.31%
Below half of FSM's 42.52%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
3.32%
Receivables growth less than half of FSM's 12.71%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x FSM's -4.18%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
25.44%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.94%
Below half of FSM's 30.45%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.97%
Below half FSM's 1.76%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.75%
Both FSM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.63%
Less than half of FSM's 64.06%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.95%
Below half of FSM's 2.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Below half of FSM's 11.74%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
4.56%
Less than half of FSM's 25.42%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-33.56%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.92%
Exceeding 1.5x FSM's -11.63%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-52.94%
Above 1.5x FSM's -6.14%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-10.63%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.26%
Less than half of FSM's 4.60%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
26.26%
Less than half of FSM's -28.60%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-10.53%
Less than half of FSM's 88.59%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.48%
Less than half of FSM's 54.00%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.20%
Less than half of FSM's 0.59%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
1.14%
≥ 1.5x FSM's 0.39%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
42.60%
Less than half of FSM's -2.21%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-0.20%
Less than half of FSM's -0.59%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
0.91%
≥ 1.5x FSM's 0.40%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-1.23%
Below half FSM's 11.74%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-1.75%
Below half FSM's 101.89%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.63%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.67%
Less than half of FSM's 98.08%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.