95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
15.46%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of RGLD's 505.49%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.46%
Below half of RGLD's 505.49%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
47.50%
Receivables growth above 1.5x RGLD's 18.04%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
162.45%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.45%
Below half of RGLD's 299.21%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.39%
Below half RGLD's -0.67%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.56%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.26%
Less than half of RGLD's 39.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.32%
Below half of RGLD's -0.25%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Below half of RGLD's 17.31%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-17.22%
Less than half of RGLD's -41.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-82.32%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.16%
Less than half of RGLD's -2.64%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-72.74%
Above 1.5x RGLD's -2.84%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.91%
50-75% of RGLD's -1.44%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a smaller yoy liability buildup than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.39%
Less than half of RGLD's -1.54%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.71%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's 11.95%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-0.11%
Less than half of RGLD's -342.86%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.00%
Below half RGLD's 25.28%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
4.08%
Below half RGLD's 17.31%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
25.56%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
-75.82%
Above 1.5x RGLD's -2.55%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-190.45%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's -137.92%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.