PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-39.31%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-39.31% vs RGLD's -10.40%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.31%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x RGLD's -10.40%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
7.97%
Receivables growth less than half of RGLD's -5.18%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
42.63%
Inventory growth below half of RGLD's -5.03%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
39.10%
Other current assets growth < half of RGLD's 88.10%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-36.41%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's -6.93%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
7.20%
Below half RGLD's -100.00%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.49%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.49%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-14.97%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-63.50%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
332.41%
Less than half of RGLD's -1.46%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.94%
Below half of RGLD's -1.27%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
Below half of RGLD's -1.73%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-3.96%
Less than half of RGLD's 18.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
100.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
101.00%
Exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.29%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
3.03%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 1.93%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-63.77%
50-75% of RGLD's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
26.26%
Less than half of RGLD's 1108.62%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
20.43%
Less than half of RGLD's -50.55%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.60%
Less than half of RGLD's -37.96%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.38%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.38%
0.75-0.9x RGLD's 13.42%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-7.35%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.09%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's 1.84%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.12%
Below half RGLD's -1.73%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-14.97%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-6.08%
Less than half of RGLD's -100.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
39.58%
Less than half of RGLD's -121.51%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.