PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.35%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-25.35% vs SA's -13.29%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Cash + STI yoy 0.75-0.9x SA's -31.79%. Bill Ackman would wonder if competitor is building liquidity more aggressively.
-11.21%
Receivables growth 50-75% of SA's -20.95%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.97%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.93%
0.75-0.9x SA's -31.38%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
-0.46%
Below half SA's 3.64%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.19%
≥ 1.5x SA's 0.06%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.75%
Below half of SA's 3.58%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
≥ 1.5x SA's -1.54%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
213.41%
Less than half of SA's -44.17%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-83.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SA and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-44.56%
Similar yoy to SA's -42.79%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-6.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Less than half of SA's 6.03%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.93%
Less than half of SA's 12.47%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.34%
1.1-1.25x SA's -17.18%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring more total obligations than competitor.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to SA's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital-raising strategies.
17.34%
Below half SA's -6.19%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
68.80%
50-75% of SA's 98.67%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
Below half SA's -0.83%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.72%
≥ 1.5x SA's -1.54%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
48.19%
Below half SA's -29.09%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-52.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to SA's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-321.65%
Less than half of SA's 13.29%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.